○ Translated from the Finnish original
Signals.⚽Matches← Home

MY CLUB

Ipswich

THE SQUAD

GKWalton
DEFOuattara
DEFDiop
DEFO'Shea
DEFDavis
MIDPalacios
MIDFlorentino
MIDFatawu
MIDEnciso
MIDPhilogene
FWDEmersonn

● season 2026-27 · latest formation · round 8

fitness concernformno measured deviation
No measured deviations in the core squad right now.
Bench
FWDFlemmingFWDAkpomMIDMcAteerMIDMatusiwaFWDEgeli

NEXT CHECK

LAST MATCH

Ipswich – Nott'm Forest 1–1 (half-time 1–1) · goals: Enciso ● result: round data

Fri 23 Oct

PREVIEW IN HINDSIGHT

No preview was published before this match. The preview below was built after the match from pre-match data only (the same read would have been produced beforehand) and graded against what happened.

Starting shape on the team sheet 4-2-3-1, in the previous match 3-4-2-1. The team sheet does not show the in-game shape, such as a back five without the ball. ● team sheet

  1. Watch first: Pressure vs the defence. Ipswich shoot this season 11.0 times per match (17th in the league, not in the Premier League last season), Nott'm Forest: 10.6 shots conceded (league 2.). The match's shot count tells which number held. ● season 2026-27 · 7 matches before the round · last season for comparison

    What happened: the defence won: 7 shots (baseline 11.0, opponent concedes 10.6). ● round data

  2. Then watch: Finishing vs the goalkeeper. Ipswich score this season from 14.3 percent of their shots (4th in the league, not in the Premier League last season), Nott'm Forest: save percentage on shots on target 60.9 (league 16.). In the match this shows in whether the goal count matches the threat created. ●

    What happened: the finishing held: 1 goals from 0.49 expected (+0.51), 14 % of shots scored. ●

  3. Third: Set pieces. Ipswich win this season 3.3 corners per match (18th in the league, not in the Premier League last season), Nott'm Forest: 4.9 corners conceded (league 8.). The expectation is at least 3 corners. ●

    What happened: fell short of expectation: 0 corners (expected 3), 1 goals. ●

  4. Fourth: Opponents get into the box. 75 shots against from inside the box (2nd most of 20), 118 shots in total (64 % from the box) ● season 2026-27 · from 7 match(es) · match statistics

    What happened: observation repeated, 15 shots against from inside the box. ●

  5. One more: Player pick. Emersonn is the team's best in the match ratings this season: 19.7 points on average in 6 matches, top three 2 times. ● season 2026-27 · match ratings before the round

    What happened: Player pick did not hold: Emersonn ranked 10/16 in his team's match ratings. Match score 5, season average before the match 19.7. ●

  6. Finally: Style of play. Plays without the ball: possession 43 % (league's 3. lowest); space comes from transitions. ● season 2026-27 · 7 matches before the round · match statistics

    What happened: Style claim held: possession 49 % (league level 50 %). ●

From this match: 3/6 held

First half0.421.40Second half0.070.93Threat by half (expected goals, gold = Ipswich): shots 6/6 and 1/11 Two-half split, not a minute-by-minute curve.
13.41.Events by minute: Ipswich on top, Nott'm Forest below, 2 goals and 2 cards. Vertical lines at minutes 45 and 90. ● match events

Result read from round data ●. Hits and misses are logged in the track record.

This match's verdict on the Matches list →

NEXT MATCH

Hull City – Ipswich

Sat 31.10. · 17:00 · ○ fixture info, as of 25.10.

This match's preview on the Matches list →

PREVIEW READING

These claims are graded against the outcome after the match.

Pressure against defence: Ipswich shoot this season 11.0 times per match (17th in the league, not in the Premier League last season), Hull City: 14.6 shots conceded (league 13.). The match's shot count tells which number held. ● season 2026-27 · 7 matches before the round · last season for comparison

Finishing against the goalkeeper: Ipswich score this season from 14.3 percent of their shots (4th in the league, not in the Premier League last season), Hull City: save percentage on shots on target 79.4 (league 2.). In the match this shows in whether the goal count matches the threat created. ● season 2026-27 · 7 matches before the round · last season for comparison

Set pieces: Ipswich win this season 3.3 corners per match (18th in the league, not in the Premier League last season), Hull City: 6.6 corners conceded (league 1.). The expectation is at least 3 corners. ● season 2026-27 · 7 matches before the round · last season for comparison

Opponents get into the box: 90 shots against from inside the box (2nd most of 20), 135 shots in total (67 % from the box) ● season 2026-27 · from 8 match(es) · match statistics

Style of play: Plays without the ball: possession 44 % (league's 4. lowest); space comes from transitions. ● season 2026-27 · 8 matches before the round · match statistics

The watch-list is published. The opponent card fills in about two days before kick-off.

TEAM BASELINE

I
Ipswich
promoted · Championship → Premier League 2026-27
now 11th in the table · 10 pts ●
Playing identity There are no Premier League measurements from last season, so identity is not locked from history. The current season has 70 measured observations, and the reading is built from them. ● season 2026-27 · match stats
What has changed?

The box has been reached too easily: 19 shots against from inside the box (33 in total) (Sun 30.8. away vs Manchester United).

Last quarter hour · Ipswich gained 7 points after the 75th minute. ● match events 2026-27 · 75 matches

Signal hypothesis · strengthening · 8 matches

Opponents appear to get into the box too easily.

+ Sun 30.8. away vs Manchester United: 19 shots against from inside the box (33 in total)

− Fri 4.9. home vs Liverpool: 5 shots against from inside the box (10 in total)

Next test Will shots conceded inside the box fall below eight?

Evidence in detail

Holds up across game states: in close periods 5.2 shots conceded from inside the box per 45 min, league 3/20 (12 periods). ● close period = margin of at most 1 goal for at least 75 % of the period's minutes · match stats by half

Other tracked hypotheses (3)

Hypothesis 2 · Discipline State · strengthening · 8 matches

The cost of indiscipline may rise.

Supports

+ Sun 30.8. away vs Manchester United: 3 cards, 12 fouls

+ Sat 19.9. away vs Everton: 4 cards, 12 fouls

+ Sat 17.10. away vs Manchester City: 2 cards, 16 fouls

+ Sat 12.9. away vs Crystal Palace: 3 cards, 16 fouls

+ Sat 10.10. home vs Fulham: 2 cards, 8 fouls

Challenges

− Fri 4.9. home vs Liverpool: 1 cards, 6 fouls

− Fri 23.10. home vs Nottingham Forest: 1 cards, 9 fouls

− Sat 22.8. home vs Sunderland: 0 cards, 12 fouls

Next test Will cards add up to suspensions, or fouls to goals conceded?

Hypothesis 3 · Box pressure State · strengthening · 4 matches

The team appears to get into the box repeatedly.

Supports

+ Sat 22.8. home vs Sunderland: 8/10 shots from inside the box

+ Sat 19.9. away vs Everton: 9/13 shots from inside the box

+ Sat 12.9. away vs Crystal Palace: 8/12 shots from inside the box

Challenges

− Fri 23.10. home vs Nottingham Forest: 3/7 shots from inside the box

Next test Will shots in the box stay above eight when the opponent defends deeper?

Hypothesis 4 · Defensive line State · mixed · 4 matches

The defence appears to hold a high line.

Supports

+ Fri 4.9. home vs Liverpool: 4 offsides won

+ Sat 22.8. home vs Sunderland: 4 offsides won

Challenges

− Sun 30.8. away vs Manchester United: 0 offsides won

− Sat 12.9. away vs Crystal Palace: 0 offsides won

Next test Will the offside trap keep working even against a more direct opponent?

Show 70 findings

Sun 30 Aug away vs Manchester United · Goalkeeper + 7 saves

Sun 30 Aug away vs Manchester United · Shooting accuracy − 5/9 shots on target (56 %)

Sun 30 Aug away vs Manchester United · Defensive line − 0 offsides won

Sun 30 Aug away vs Manchester United · Discipline + 3 cards, 12 fouls

Sun 30 Aug away vs Manchester United · Duels − 34 % of duels won (29/85)

Sun 30 Aug away vs Manchester United · Possession and duels − possession 40 %, duels 34 %

Sun 30 Aug away vs Manchester United · Set pieces − 4 corners, 8 conceded

Sun 30 Aug away vs Manchester United · Own box + 19 shots against from inside the box (33 in total)

Fri 4 Sep home vs Liverpool · Finishing + 0 goals from 0.75 expected (-0.75)

Fri 4 Sep home vs Liverpool · Threat by half − own threat 0.51 → 0.25 xG, opponents 0.42 → 0.26

Fri 4 Sep home vs Liverpool · Goalkeeper + 5 saves

Fri 4 Sep home vs Liverpool · Shooting accuracy − 5/14 shots on target (36 %)

Fri 4 Sep home vs Liverpool · Defensive line + 4 offsides won

Fri 4 Sep home vs Liverpool · Discipline − 1 cards, 6 fouls

Fri 4 Sep home vs Liverpool · Duels − 45 % of duels won (40/89)

Fri 4 Sep home vs Liverpool · Possession and duels − possession 45 %, duels 45 %

Fri 4 Sep home vs Liverpool · Own box − 5 shots against from inside the box (10 in total)

Fri 23 Oct home vs Nottingham Forest · Finishing − 1 goals from 0.49 expected (+0.51)

Fri 23 Oct home vs Nottingham Forest · Threat by half − own threat 0.42 → 0.07 xG, opponents 1.40 → 0.93

Fri 23 Oct home vs Nottingham Forest · Goalkeeper − 3 saves

Fri 23 Oct home vs Nottingham Forest · Shooting accuracy − 3/7 shots on target (43 %)

Fri 23 Oct home vs Nottingham Forest · Discipline − 1 cards, 9 fouls

Fri 23 Oct home vs Nottingham Forest · Duels − 48 % of duels won (46/95)

Fri 23 Oct home vs Nottingham Forest · Possession and duels − possession 49 %, duels 48 %

Fri 23 Oct home vs Nottingham Forest · Own box + 15 shots against from inside the box (17 in total)

Fri 23 Oct home vs Nottingham Forest · Box pressure − 3/7 shots from inside the box

Sat 22 Aug home vs Sunderland · Threat by half − own threat 0.95 → 0.79 xG, opponents 0.58 → 0.17

Sat 22 Aug home vs Sunderland · Goalkeeper − 2 saves

Sat 22 Aug home vs Sunderland · Shooting accuracy + 3/10 shots on target (30 %)

Sat 22 Aug home vs Sunderland · Defensive line + 4 offsides won

Sat 22 Aug home vs Sunderland · Discipline − 0 cards, 12 fouls

Sat 22 Aug home vs Sunderland · Duels + 54 % of duels won (62/114)

Sat 22 Aug home vs Sunderland · Possession and duels − possession 38 %, duels 54 %

Sat 22 Aug home vs Sunderland · Set pieces − 3 corners, 5 conceded

Sat 22 Aug home vs Sunderland · Own box − 5 shots against from inside the box (11 in total)

Sat 22 Aug home vs Sunderland · Box pressure + 8/10 shots from inside the box

Sat 19 Sep away vs Everton · Finishing + 0 goals from 1.44 expected (-1.44)

Sat 19 Sep away vs Everton · Threat by half − own threat 0.86 → 0.58 xG, opponents 1.30 → 0.93

Sat 19 Sep away vs Everton · Goalkeeper − 1 saves

Sat 19 Sep away vs Everton · Shooting accuracy − 4/13 shots on target (31 %)

Sat 19 Sep away vs Everton · Discipline + 4 cards, 12 fouls

Sat 19 Sep away vs Everton · Duels − 47 % of duels won (41/87)

Sat 19 Sep away vs Everton · Possession and duels − possession 48 %, duels 47 %

Sat 19 Sep away vs Everton · Own box + 13 shots against from inside the box (21 in total)

Sat 19 Sep away vs Everton · Box pressure + 9/13 shots from inside the box

Sat 17 Oct away vs Manchester City · Goalkeeper + 4 saves

Sat 17 Oct away vs Manchester City · Shooting accuracy − 3/8 shots on target (38 %)

Sat 17 Oct away vs Manchester City · Discipline + 2 cards, 16 fouls

Sat 17 Oct away vs Manchester City · Duels + 52 % of duels won (52/100)

Sat 17 Oct away vs Manchester City · Possession and duels − possession 30 %, duels 52 %

Sat 17 Oct away vs Manchester City · Set pieces − 3 corners, 2 conceded

Sat 17 Oct away vs Manchester City · Own box + 15 shots against from inside the box (19 in total)

Sat 12 Sep away vs Crystal Palace · Finishing − 3 goals from 1.67 expected (+1.33)

Sat 12 Sep away vs Crystal Palace · Goalkeeper − 2 saves

Sat 12 Sep away vs Crystal Palace · Shooting accuracy − 6/12 shots on target (50 %)

Sat 12 Sep away vs Crystal Palace · Defensive line − 0 offsides won

Sat 12 Sep away vs Crystal Palace · Discipline + 3 cards, 16 fouls

Sat 12 Sep away vs Crystal Palace · Duels − 44 % of duels won (39/89)

Sat 12 Sep away vs Crystal Palace · Possession and duels + possession 53 %, duels 44 %

Sat 12 Sep away vs Crystal Palace · Set pieces − 3 corners, 6 conceded

Sat 12 Sep away vs Crystal Palace · Own box + 9 shots against from inside the box (11 in total)

Sat 12 Sep away vs Crystal Palace · Box pressure + 8/12 shots from inside the box

Sat 10 Oct home vs Fulham · Finishing − 2 goals from 1.22 expected (+0.78)

Sat 10 Oct home vs Fulham · Threat by half + own threat 0.11 → 1.11 xG, opponents 0.48 → 1.39

Sat 10 Oct home vs Fulham · Goalkeeper − 3 saves

Sat 10 Oct home vs Fulham · Shooting accuracy − 5/11 shots on target (45 %)

Sat 10 Oct home vs Fulham · Discipline + 2 cards, 8 fouls

Sat 10 Oct home vs Fulham · Duels − 51 % of duels won (45/89)

Sat 10 Oct home vs Fulham · Possession and duels − possession 48 %, duels 51 %

Sat 10 Oct home vs Fulham · Own box + 9 shots against from inside the box (13 in total)

A finding is one measured item from one match. A + mark supports the pattern, a − challenges it.

Suljetut hypoteesit (7)

What is closed is not deleted: it shows what we thought and why the view changed.

Hypothesis 1 · Goalkeeper State · closed · 8 matches

The goalkeeper's level may prove the difference for this team.

Supports

+ Sun 30.8. away vs Manchester United: 7 saves

+ Fri 4.9. home vs Liverpool: 5 saves

+ Sat 17.10. away vs Manchester City: 4 saves

Challenges

− Fri 23.10. home vs Nottingham Forest: 3 saves

− Sat 22.8. home vs Sunderland: 2 saves

− Sat 19.9. away vs Everton: 1 saves

− Sat 12.9. away vs Crystal Palace: 2 saves

− Sat 10.10. home vs Fulham: 3 saves

Next test Will the shot-stopping level hold when shot quality changes?

Hypothesis 2 · Finishing State · closed · 5 matches

Goal output may keep falling short of the chances created.

Supports

+ Fri 4.9. home vs Liverpool: 0 goals from 0.75 expected (-0.75)

+ Sat 19.9. away vs Everton: 0 goals from 1.44 expected (-1.44)

Challenges

− Fri 23.10. home vs Nottingham Forest: 1 goals from 0.49 expected (+0.51)

− Sat 12.9. away vs Crystal Palace: 3 goals from 1.67 expected (+1.33)

− Sat 10.10. home vs Fulham: 2 goals from 1.22 expected (+0.78)

Next test Will the goal count move closer to the expected number in the next match?

Hypothesis 3 · Duels State · closed · 8 matches

Duels appear to carry this team's game.

Supports

+ Sat 22.8. home vs Sunderland: 54 % of duels won (62/114)

+ Sat 17.10. away vs Manchester City: 52 % of duels won (52/100)

Challenges

− Sun 30.8. away vs Manchester United: 34 % of duels won (29/85)

− Fri 4.9. home vs Liverpool: 45 % of duels won (40/89)

− Fri 23.10. home vs Nottingham Forest: 48 % of duels won (46/95)

− Sat 19.9. away vs Everton: 47 % of duels won (41/87)

− Sat 12.9. away vs Crystal Palace: 44 % of duels won (39/89)

− Sat 10.10. home vs Fulham: 51 % of duels won (45/89)

Next test Will the duel-win rate stay above half even against a possession-dominant opponent?

Hypothesis 4 · Threat by half State · closed · 5 matches

The threat appears weighted towards the second half.

Supports

+ Sat 10.10. home vs Fulham: own threat 0.11 → 1.11 xG, opponents 0.48 → 1.39

Challenges

− Fri 4.9. home vs Liverpool: own threat 0.51 → 0.25 xG, opponents 0.42 → 0.26

− Fri 23.10. home vs Nottingham Forest: own threat 0.42 → 0.07 xG, opponents 1.40 → 0.93

− Sat 22.8. home vs Sunderland: own threat 0.95 → 0.79 xG, opponents 0.58 → 0.17

− Sat 19.9. away vs Everton: own threat 0.86 → 0.58 xG, opponents 1.30 → 0.93

Next test Will the threat still grow from first half to second in a competitive match?

Hypothesis 5 · Possession and duels State · closed · 8 matches

Possession may not be matched by duel wins.

Supports

+ Sat 12.9. away vs Crystal Palace: possession 53 %, duels 44 %

Challenges

− Sun 30.8. away vs Manchester United: possession 40 %, duels 34 %

− Fri 4.9. home vs Liverpool: possession 45 %, duels 45 %

− Fri 23.10. home vs Nottingham Forest: possession 49 %, duels 48 %

− Sat 22.8. home vs Sunderland: possession 38 %, duels 54 %

− Sat 19.9. away vs Everton: possession 48 %, duels 47 %

− Sat 17.10. away vs Manchester City: possession 30 %, duels 52 %

− Sat 10.10. home vs Fulham: possession 48 %, duels 51 %

Next test Will the duel balance flip when the opponent presses higher?

Hypothesis 6 · Shooting accuracy State · closed · 8 matches

Shots don't appear to hit the target often enough.

Supports

+ Sat 22.8. home vs Sunderland: 3/10 shots on target (30 %)

Challenges

− Sun 30.8. away vs Manchester United: 5/9 shots on target (56 %)

− Fri 4.9. home vs Liverpool: 5/14 shots on target (36 %)

− Fri 23.10. home vs Nottingham Forest: 3/7 shots on target (43 %)

− Sat 19.9. away vs Everton: 4/13 shots on target (31 %)

− Sat 17.10. away vs Manchester City: 3/8 shots on target (38 %)

− Sat 12.9. away vs Crystal Palace: 6/12 shots on target (50 %)

− Sat 10.10. home vs Fulham: 5/11 shots on target (45 %)

Next test Will the share of shots on target rise above a third?

Hypothesis 7 · Set pieces State · closed · 4 matches

Set pieces may keep coming to nothing.

Supports

No longer backed by the evidence.

Challenges

− Sun 30.8. away vs Manchester United: 4 corners, 8 conceded

− Sat 22.8. home vs Sunderland: 3 corners, 5 conceded

− Sat 17.10. away vs Manchester City: 3 corners, 2 conceded

− Sat 12.9. away vs Crystal Palace: 3 corners, 6 conceded

Next test Will a corner or free kick produce a goal in the coming rounds?

● season 2026-27 · from 8 match(es) · match statistics

Measured numbers for the season
Style of play · season 2026-27

Line: line mid-level: 13 offsides drawn ● season 2026-27 · from 8 match(es) · offsides and shot locations

Progression: progression mid-table: 39.2 passes per shot, possession 44 % ● season 2026-27 · from 8 match(es) · passes and shots

Set pieces: in attack 23 corners (league 20./20), no headed goals yet; in defence 38 corners against (9./20), no headed goals conceded ● season 2026-27 · from 8 match(es) · corners and goal types

Second half: own end tightens late (concessions 9+7); own threat rose in the second half in 3 of 8 matches (median −0.16 xG, league +0.15); opponents' threat rose in the second half in 4 of 8 matches (median +0.02 xG, league +0.15); first substitution on average at minute 62 ● season 2026-27 · from 8 match(es) · goals and substitutions by minute

When leading: withstood the pressure: led at half-time once and won, although the opponent's threat grew (opponent xG vs Crystal Palace 0.20 → 0.41) ● season 2026-27 · from 8 match(es) · threat by half

Game state: Leading 8 % of playing time, level 47 %, trailing 45 %. League rank 2 for time trailing, so the season numbers lean towards chasing the game. ● minutes from goal events · ○ interpretation

First half0.650.80Second half0.731.28

Threat by half, average of 8 matches (gold = Ipswich): own threat rose in the second half in 3 of 8 matches, median −0.16 xG (league +0.15). Two-half split, not a minute curve.

Tracking · season 2026-27

Opponents get into the box: 90 shots against from inside the box (2nd most of 20), 135 shots in total (67 % from the box) ● season 2026-27 · from 8 match(es) · match statistics
We track whether the number of shots conceded in the box narrows: leaking the box predicts goals conceded over a longer sample.

Holds up across game states: in close periods 5.2 shots conceded from inside the box per 45 min, league 3/20 (12 periods). ● close period = margin of at most 1 goal for at least 75 % of the period's minutes · match stats by half

One round is not a trend, so each line says what we track next.

Data limit: we see how many shots there are and where they come from (inside or outside the box), plus the game state. We do not see the route the attack took (through the middle or down the flanks) or where possession was lost.

TEAM MEMORY

ON THIS DAY

No verified club memory for this date.